Skip to main content
Zimei TechnologyEnterprise AI · Development and delivery
EnglishEN
Discuss a project

Quality Exception Management

Track Quality Issues Without Chasing Updates.

Bring inspection records, rules, affected batches, owners, and next actions into one exception workflow. Frontline teams know who acts next; managers can track progress and outcomes.

First article inspection · MO-0717-08Pump body A17/B10:42

Mounting surface height

8.7 mmAllow 8.2–8.6

Same Batch

24 items pending

Next step

The quality manager decidesRe-inspection·Isolation·Rework
Readings are traceableVisible impact on batchesExecute after confirmation

The same quality abnormality

Review the Facts Before Deciding the Batch Outcome.

Switching between three processing moments, the current conclusion, what information is missing, and the next step will all change together.

Current:Out of Tolerance.The actual measurement is 8.7 mm, which is higher than the upper limit of 8.6 mm marked on the drawing. Next step:The same batch of 24 pieces remains pending and will not enter the next process.

View processing progressThe same exception appears on three pages at three times
Manufacturing quality benchException review

Information updated to 07-17 11:00

Quality Engineer

CNC machining 04 · First article 1 / 5

Pump body A17 / B · Mounting surface height

Exception number QN-2026-0717-04
The same batch is pending first
Actual measurement resultsSource traceable
8.7 mmPermissible range 8.2–8.6 mm
Digital Height Gauge HG-04Inspection Record IR-0717-118
The rules used this timeChecked
WI-QC-214 · v3.2

Suitable for pump body A17/B, finishing process, mounting surface height.

Measuring tool calibration is validSampling 10:42
current conclusionThe actual measurement is 8.7 mm, which is higher than the upper limit of 8.6 mm marked on the drawing.
Still have to deal withFirst check the original records, gage status and the rule version currently in use.
Next stepThe same batch of 24 pieces remains pending and will not enter the next process.Owner:Inspector, quality engineer
The same batch quantity is 24 pieces · The current status will retain processing records
Return additional informationSend for Owner Review
The self-built interface uses independently constructed non-customer inspection records, not customer project screenshots. The three buttons only switch the preset processing time on the page and do not connect to equipment, production lines or quality systems, nor do they change the batch status; the actual fields, rules and permissions are determined by project.

Encountered uncertain situations on site

Missing Evidence? Keep the Batch on Hold.

On-site personnel can see clearly what is missing, what to do next, and who to contact for confirmation.
Inspection area B-04Waiting for confirmation
24 items

Confirm clearly before deciding the next step

01 · original record

Where did this reading come from?

Next stepSupplement inspection records
Who to ask for confirmationinspector
02 · Applicable rules

Drawings and instructions, which one should I listen to?

Next stepConfirm current version
Who to ask for confirmationQuality Engineer
03 · Re-examination results

What should I do if the two results are different?

Next stepDecide whether to expand inspections
Who to ask for confirmationQuality manager

Why look for Zimei Technology

A Quality Workflow, Not Just an Exception Log.

Starting from the existing inspection records, quality rules and job divisions, a backend usable on site is made, and then historical anomalies are used to verify each item.

Existing information

  • Drawings and Rules
  • historical anomaly
  • Position authority
Exception review deskAn anomaly·A fact
ReadingrulesDispose
  1. discover
  2. Supplementary certificate
  3. Review
  4. Confirm

Historical anomaly verification

  • Size out of tolerance
  • Missing data
  • Rule conflict
  • Re-inspection Mismatch
  1. 01

    First choose a type of true anomaly

    Take a high-frequency test and desensitization history and align field practices with page fields.

  2. 02

    The basis is right next to the record

    There is no need to search through several sets of data for readings, original records, rule versions and affected batches.

  3. 03

    Use Existing Access Rules

    Supplementary information, review and final disposition will continue to be confirmed by the corresponding position, and the records will be kept intact.

  4. 04

    Verify item by item using historical results

    Excessive tolerances, lack of information, rule conflicts and re-inspection results are all checked item by item as agreed and expected.

Next step

Send us a desensitization quality abnormality.

Attach the corresponding drawings or rules, who is handling it now, and where the results will go. We will reply on which pages to build in the first stage, which data to receive, as well as quotations and schedules.
Discuss a project